Monday, March 12, 2012

Proposed Election 2012 Caucus Resolutions for Judicial Reform (updated & expanded) Part 1of 2

Before reducing anything else to writing, this author asserts by the facts and evidence submitted herein, every Minnesotan reading this article should conclude that the Minnesota Courts and Legal System are Systemically Corrupt and unfit to provide Citizens the Unalienable Natural Law Right to “Due Process as prescribed by the Rule of Law”.  And, therefore, these said Minnesota Courts are unfit to render justice to anyone.

The Minnesota District, Appellate and Supreme Courts have rendered themselves increasingly unfit with a large number of laws, case law rulings, rules and unconstitutional failures to allow citizens to petition for redress of grievances with the net effect of rendering citizens “insecure in their persons” The right to be “Secure in our Persons” is another Unalienable Natural Law Right. (See Declaration of Independence for references to “Laws of Nature” and “Unalienable Rights” )

To the point, one of the Minnesota Courts’ most recent rulings renders the Minnesota Judiciary and Legal System absolutely unfit to render justice. The ruling at hand is the Minnesota Courts’ unpublished ruling in Fabian, May and Anderson PLLP v Volkommer A10-1205. In that opinion, the Courts ruled that Minnesota Lawyers do not have to treat their clients ethically.  In more complicated legal terms, Minnesota Courts have essentially ruled that the Minnesota Lawyers’ Code of Professional Conduct (aka Code of ethics) is not an implied covenant of a contract between a Minnesota Lawyer and their client(s).

The only explanation for the Courts ruling this way, and Minnesota Lawyers not raising a morally provoked hue and cry, is that the Minnesota Courts and Minnesota Lawyers intend to treat Minnesota Citizens unethically.  This author challenges Minnesota Judges and Lawyers to provide another reasonable explanation.

As many of you know, this author has pursed Transparency, Accountability and Reform (TAR) of the Minnesota Judiciary for about 20 years. - <-(Section 4)  - - And this author has worked towards Government TAR for the past 5 or 6 years.  - <- (Sections 2-3)

For the past 7 years, hundreds of Minnesotan Citizens have asked to give testimony and evidence of corruption in the Minnesota Judiciary before the Minnesota State House and Senate judiciary Committees. WE THE PEOPLE have been refused.

Further evidence of this author’s and other Minnesotan Citizens work towards Judicial TAR can be found here. In 2009, after 5 years of both the MN State House and Senate Judiciary Committees refusing 100’s of Minnesotans to them for redress of grievances, WE THE PEOPLE were forced to operate a purely unofficial “Ad Hoc” hearing simply to document some of the grievances Citizens would like to provide the MN Judiciary Committees before these citizens died, moved or moved on with their lives.

MN 2009 Ad Hoc Committee on Judicial Corruption Part 1 
MN 2009 Ad Hoc Committee on Judicial CorruptionPart 2

 And as further proof that Judicial TAR is not this author’s disgruntled one man crusade, this author offers these various blogs and websites owned and managed by other Citizens, many of the Minnesota Citizens.

Carver County (MN) Corruption
Carver County Judge Perkins orders security increased as Lea Banken exposes departure from the Rule of Law on blog
Justice in Minnesota
Washington County (MN) Corruption
Lawless America
Exposing the Record
Jesse Ventura – Mad as Hell
Justice for Poor Americans
New York Judicial Discipline Reform
DEFINITION: Simulated Litigation & Fact Shaping
Judicial Watch
National Forum on Judicial Accountability
 National Alliance for Family Court Justice

The 1st Amendment guarantees the right of WE THE PEOPLE to “petition the Government for redress of grievances” without fear of reprisal. Our Minnesota Government and Judiciary have violated this fundamental right. They have unethically and unconstitutionally retaliated against this author (and others) by ruling against him in unrelated civil matters.

And it is not just our Minnesota, but also our Federal Government, that has a history of violating the rights of Citizens to petition their government for redress of grievances. Our rogue Federal government has a policy of demonizing, discrediting and destroying the lives of persons who dare to confront the tyranny of our government by exercising their Natural Law and Constitutional Rights. FBI Operation COINTELPRO:


From December 1963 until his death in 1968, Martin Luther King, Jr. was the target of an intensive campaign by the Federal Bureau of Investigation to "neutralize" him as an effective civil rights leader. In the words of the man in charge of the FBI's "war" against Dr. King:

No holds were barred. We have used [similar] techniques against Soviet agents. [The same methods were] brought home against any organization against which we were targeted. We did not differentiate. This is a rough, tough business.

While the facts and experiences written above and contained in his Memorandum of Law that follows, are those of the author; Judicial TAR is not about this author. This is about fundamental right and wrong and the Rule of Law.

“The Rule of Law is the only thing that stands between Consent of the Governed and the Divine Right of Kings.”

Don Mashak 2011

Rule of Law Divine Right of Kings Consent of the Governed

This article is intended to push back the tide of Judicial tyranny that has engulfed WE THE PEOPLE, ensure that every citizen is secure in their person, and not denied their unalienable Natural Law and Constitutional Rights to Due Process pursuant to the Rule of Law as intended under Natural Law and by the Founders of this Country.

As savagely as the Government has retaliated.......

Continue reading for free on Why you should never hire a Minnesota lawyer!

In Closing,

Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.

Please join with me in mutually pledging to each other and our fellow citizens our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor to our mutual endeavors of restoring liberty and economic opportunity to WE THE PEOPLE as our Founding Fathers envisioned and intended. [Last paragraph, Declaration of Independence]

This article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense”

Tell My Politician

Those were my thoughts.

Keep Fighting the Good Fight!

In Liberty,

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
Google Plus


End the Fed(eral Reserve Bank System)
National  Minneapolis

Lawless America

Justice in Minnesota #JIM

Bring Home the Politicians #BHTP

Get out of our House #GOOOH

Critical Thinking Notice - This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking ( in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this author... unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate you to the contrary of your perspective.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for commenting. Your comment will appear after being reviewed for spam, relevance and decorum.