Thursday, February 23, 2012

If I were running for President of the USA... Part 2 of 3

This is Part 2 of a 3 Part series.  It may be helpful to read this article in sequence to be familiar various foundation and premises laid out in earlier parts and to understand various assertions in the proper context.
                                                  ----------
You can read Part 1 of  3 by clicking here -> http://exm.nr/wOA6Zn

4)   JUDICIAL TRANSPARENCY, ACCOUNTABILITY AND REFORM (Continued)

RIGHT TO CRITICIZE JUDGES/PROHIBITION OF RETALIATION

Judges often retaliate when criticized.  This candidate himself has experience said retaliation for criticizing the Minnesota Judiciary.


The Right to Free Speech is Sacred in America.  The Right to criticize the government without reprisal is a hallmark requirement of a Representative Republic. Yet judges often fine, sanction, jail, fix cases against and otherwise retaliate against citizens, lawyers and other government officials who would dare criticize.
It is in the interest of free speech, transparency and accountability that this Candidate for president indicates he would pursue legislation to remedy, restrict and criminalize this retaliation.

DUPLICITOUS USES OF THE COURTS

The Courts are used to punish voices of political dissent.  Findings and Judgments not consistent with the Rule of Law are used to give adverse rulings to those who are Leaders or otherwise vocal in their political dissent of the government.

The Courts are used to marginalize political opponents.  Again, think Rulings or the Delay of rulings inconsistent with the Rule of Law.

The Courts are used as an exchange of political favors. ibid

The Courts are used to exact personal grudges of judges and their friends. ibid

The Courts are used to fulfill commitments for gifts otherwise known as bribes. Ibid

The Congress has the Judiciary make laws as a matter of case law, so Congress does not have to face the fallout at election time. Since, most Federal Judges are appointed and not elected; they are insulated from electoral retribution by WE THE PEOPLE.

As president, besides the Transparency, Accountability and Reform expressed elsewhere in this document, I will pursue other measures to assure all citizens that come before the Courts receive justice in accordance to the Rule of Law applied to the impartially admitted facts in evidence.

SUPREME AND/OR APPELLATE COURT REFUSAL TO HEAR APPEAL

Because the Judicial and Legal System of the United States has become systemically corrupt, there is a necessity of greater transparency and accountability.

An area that has been alleged to be a point of abuse is the rejection of appeals without explanation.  Ergo, WE THE PEOPLE have no idea of the rejection was done pursuant to the Rule of Law or some other unethical, illegal, unconstitutional reason.

As President, I would press legislation requiring all appeals that Federal and State, Supreme and/or Appellate Courts refuse to hear shall be provided with at least a one page explanation (Not including headers).
If reason for denying an appeal is a simple, correctable deficiency or error, the court shall provide a simple explanation of how to correct the deficiency or error and grant 30 days to fix the error or deficiency.
Otherwise, if historic legitimate reasons fall into 5-10 categories, a form with check boxes can be used and a 3-4 sentence summary of the rejection would suffice.

And of course it would have to contain the certification language discussed under a previous heading.
As president, I would pursue these reforms.

OTHER POTENTIAL REFORMS AND EXAMPLES OF JUDICIAL CORRUPTION

To read other potential reforms being pursued by Judicial Reform groups in Minnesota, click here-> http://bit.ly/A8zw7H

To learn about other examples of judicial corruption in Minnesota, try these sources:

Marlena’s Journal http://amzn.to/yNuL3l
Minnesota Injustice http://mncourtreform.org

5)   CITIZENS ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMITTEE

As President I would vigorously seek to set up a Citizen’s Anti-Corruption Committee consisting of 50 randomly selected citizens. 1 from each state.

The first requirements would be at least a high school diploma and no felony convictions.

Secondly, the individual will not have held elected office or worked for the government and promises not to hold elected office or work for the government for the rest of their lives.

[Article Continues below almost universal translator]
Vertaal na Afrikaans |Translate në shqip | ترجمةإلىالعربية | Թարգմանելհայերեն| Azərbaycan Tərcümə | Euskal Translate| Перавесці на беларускай| বাংলাঅনুবাদ | Превод на български| Traduir al català | 转换为中文(简体)|翻譯到中國(傳統) | Prevedi na hrvatskom | Translate to Czech | Oversæt til dansk | Te vertalen naar het Nederlands | Tõlgi eesti | Isalin sa Filipino sa| Käännä Suomen | Traduire en français | Traducir a Galego | თარგმნეთსაქართველოს| Übersetzen auf Deutsch | Μετάφραση στα ελληνικά| ગુજરાતીઅનુવાદ | Tradui kreyòl ayisyen | תרגוםעברית | सेहिन्दीअनुवाद| Fordítás magyar | Þýða til Íslenska | Terjemahkan ke bahasa Indonesia| Aistrigh go Gaeilge| Traduci in italiano | 日本語に翻訳| ಕನ್ನಡಗೆಭಾಷಾಂತರಿಸಿ | 한국어번역| Translate to Latine | Tulkot uz latviešu | Latvian Tulkot uz latviešu| Versti į lietuvių| Преведете на македонски| Terjemah ke Bahasa Malaysia| Ittraduċi għall-Malti| Oversette til norsk |ترجمهبهفارسی| Przekłada się na polskim | Traduzir para Português | Traduceţi în română |Перевести на русскую|Преведи на Српском | Preložiť na slovenský |Prevedi v slovenski | Traducir al español | Tafsiri kwa Kiswahili | Översätt till svenska | தமிழ்மொழிபெயர்க்கவும்| తెలుగులోఅనువదించడానికి | แปลเป็นไทย| Çevir Türkçe>| Перекласти українською| اردومیںترجمہکریں  | Dịch cho người Việt Nam| Cyfieithu i'r Gymraeg | איבערזעצןצוייִדיש |



Thirdly, these persons would agree to make all of their personal and 1st degree relatives finances public for the 1 year before taking office, during all years served on the committee and for 20 years after said service.  In exchange for making their finances public, the committee member will get $10,000 for each year of compliance and their 1st degree relatives will get $5000.00 per year.  The contractual obligation to maintain their finances as public shall be irrevocable once the any recipient has accepted one or more payments. (unless they are convicted of a felony)

These citizens shall be given a budget and authority to investigate ant part of Federal or State Government (Any office, branch, county, city, school, police, judge, president, dog catcher, etc) they so desire.  They can get search warrants, wire taps etc using the same standards that apply to law enforcement.

Elected officials and Government Bureaucrats shall be noticed that they are employees and have no expectation of privacy in using government property or property paid for by the government.

This Anti-Corruption Committee can present their findings directly to any appropriate Grand Jury, Congress, Federal District Court or State Legislature.  Or, they can request advice and assistance from the appropriate Federal, State or County Attorneys.  Failure of any Government Attorney to give timely and correct assistance to this committee shall be considered treason and punishable as such....

 To Continue Reading for free, Click here -> http://exm.nr/zQZXJJ

In Closing,

Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.
Please join with me in mutually pledging to each other and our fellow citizens our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor to our mutual endeavors of restoring liberty and economic opportunity to WE THE PEOPLE as our Founding Fathers envisioned and intended. [Last sentence, US Declaration of Independence ( http://bit.ly/ruPE7z )]

Next, it has came to this author's attention that many local papers will not run letters to the editor, Op Ed pieces and articles that do not conform to the perspective of the local "Powers that be".  If you have a letter to the editor that relates to this article, feel free to post it as a comment, noting that the local news source refused to run it. As long as it conforms with general decorum and is plausible, very rarely will we refuse to publish it. If you have unrelated subject matter  and/or video and/or audio that you believe we would be interested in based (based on our prior articles), email it here . Send video/audio in common Internet formats or with Youtube.com links.  Do not send video in Public Access TV and/or Cable formats. Our philosophy is that more open public dialogue is better than less public dialogue.

This article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar

TellMyPolitician http://goo.gl/1FWfz

Keep Fighting the Good Fight!

Those were my thoughts.

In Liberty,

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak
http://www.facebook.com/don.mashak

WE THE PEOPLE TAR
http://WETHEPEOPLETAR.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR

Republic for united State of America #RuSA
http://republicfortheunitedstates.org

End the Fed(eral Reserve Bank System)
National http://bit.ly/ta3Rju  Minneapolis http://bit.ly/tjZJKF

Examiner.com - Express Yourself -
Write for Examiner.com  Just Click here http://exm.nr/ljgfmD

Lawless America /  Get A Grip America
http://LawlessAmerica.com   http://getagripamerica.us

Justice in Minnesota #JIM
http://JusticeinMN.com

Bring Home the Politicians #BHTP
http://BringHomethePoliticians.com

Get out of our House #GOOOH
http://GOOOH.com

Committees of Safety
http://committeesofsafety.org  http://committee.org/ History of here  http://bit.ly/qscBHc

United States Militia #USM
http://UnitedStatesMilitia.com

Food Freedom
http://foodfreedom.wordpress.com

Critical Thinking Notice - This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve) in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this author... unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate you to the contrary of your perspective.

3 comments:

  1. Aw, thiѕ waѕ a veгy good ρost. Taking the
    timе аnd аctual effort to make а very good aгticle… but what can I say… Ӏ hesitate a lot аnԁ nevеr seem tο get neаrly anythіng done.


    Μу blоg: reputation management

    ReplyDelete
  2. Have you еver cοnsiderеd crеating an ebook οr guest authοгing
    on other sites? I have a blog centered оn the
    sаme subjectѕ уou ԁіscuss and wοulԁ love to havе you
    share some stοries/informatiοn. Ι knoω my
    νieωerѕ wοuld enјoy your work.
    If you're even remotely interested, feel free to shoot me an e-mail.

    Here is my webpage: Lloyd Irvin

    ReplyDelete
  3. You are so awesome! I don't believe I've truly read through a single thing like this before.
    So good to discover another person with original thoughts on this subject matter.
    Really.. many thanks for starting this up. This website is one thing that's needed on
    the internet, someone with a bit of originality!

    My web blog :: link building for reputation management

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for commenting. Your comment will appear after being reviewed for spam, relevance and decorum.